Charismatic leadership: an exploratory investigation, page 3 gestures, inflections and speaking styles used to gain a desired effect on the audience. Additional probing explored the use of humor, the importance or emphasis on personal appearance, or any other variable used by the research subjects to invoke emotion from their given audience. TheseCited by: 5 Charismatic Leadership According to DiPadova, Weber introduced the concept of charisma when viewing authority in regards to religion. In this These characteristics are. Leaders such as John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Charles Manson, and Adolph Hitler were People that follow the The study concluded that charismatic leadership has become more rigorous in recent decades, and that organizations' growth strategies frequently require modification during times of crisis. The current study's findings will serve as a guide for government organizations, particularly Erbil's Ministry of Planning, in identifying individuals who are capable of leading in a charismatic manner during times Author: DB Subedi
Charismatic leadership Research Papers - blogger.com
Try out PMC Labs and tell us what you think, charismatic leadership research. Learn More. In the end, this study propose advice on how to improve the coal mine enterprise managers charismatic leadership style in the coal mine enterprise's safety management work, including attach great importance to a variety of incentive methods, set up safety moral models, practice of inductive leadership concept, create a good atmosphere of safety, etc for reference for coal mining enterprises.
The charismatic leadership model by House [ 1 ] was built based on following models. Charismatic leaderships usually have the power of role models and serve as good examples advocating some beliefs and values if they hope that their followers hold these beliefs and values; charismatic leaderships are competent in some fields; they set clear goals with moral colors; they have high expectations for their followers and believe that their followers have the ability to do what they are expected to do, charismatic leadership research.
As a result, such behaviors increase the charismatic leadership research of followers towards their own abilities and efficacy, thus further improving their performance.
According to Bass and Avolio [ 2 ], charismatic leaderships have following features. Charismatic leaderships can usually stir enthusiasms of followers for work and make them have particularly high expectations, so that charismatic leaderships can charismatic leadership research followers while achieving organizational goals; charismatic leaderships adhere to an independent way of thinking and create a good atmosphere to support their followers; charismatic leaderships usually pay great attention to intellectual excitation of their followers including the belief and core value development in organizational development; charismatic leaderships fully show their charm, to motivate their followers to pursue goals they develop, set a good example and win recognition of followers, charismatic leadership research, so that followers have a sense of mission for their self-development.
Thus it can be seen that leaderships serve as instructors and give relevant advices. In a paper, Bao Lingling and Wang Tao [ 3 ] investigate the impact of charismatic leaderships on subordinates in China from three dimensions. The first one is the personality charm; the second one the ability charm; the third one relationship charm. Based on an empirical study, charismatic leadership research, Feng Jiangping and Luo Guozhong [ 4 ] reveal that charismatic leadership is a five-factor models.
Based on a questionnaire survey, an exploratory factor analysis is made and five factors are chosen from seven kinds of traits for validations, charismatic leadership research.
In research on unsafe behaviors made abroad, both Senders [ 5 ] and Themse [ 6 ] give definitions to human error. In China, Zhou Gang [ 7 ] also makes research on human error and unsafe behaviors. In general, human error refers to the phenomenon that behavioral results of humans deviate from specified targets or exceed acceptable limits, thus producing a negative impact.
In analyzing fatal accidents, unsafe behaviors are defined as human behavioral errors which may cause accidents.
Unsafe behaviors refer to behavioral errors of individuals that can cause accidents. According to Cao Qingren, unsafe behaviors refer to human behaviors that once caused or may cause accidents and the direct cause of accidents [ 8 ]. According to research made at home and abroad on operation modes of people, it can be seen that the majority of scholars believe that human causes can be equated to unsafe behaviors of human.
Li Kai [ 9 ] divides unsafe operating behaviors into unintentional and intentional ones, from the perspective of cognitive psychology. In the field of security management, Barling [ 10 ] and other scholars believe that transformational leadership can effectively improve the safety level of employees.
Du Fengwen [ 11 ] concludes that charismatic leadership has a significant impact on organizational citizenship behaviors, on the basis of the Achievement Motivation Theory, the Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, charismatic leadership research, and the Charismatic Leadership Theory.
However, few studies have been made on the impact of charismatic leadership management in coal mine enterprises on unsafe behaviors of miners. Miners, constituting the core part of the development of coal mine enterprises, have received increasingly great attention from coal mine enterprises.
Meanwhile, safety problems, enjoying the top priority in safety production of miners, have attracted more and more attention from coal mine enterprises. Effective measures should be adopted to prevent and control unsafe behaviors of miners, as their behaviors are of great significance for the safety production of enterprises, charismatic leadership research.
According to research on relationships between leadership styles and behaviors of employees, charismatic leadership research, attitudes towards safety, as a mediator between leadership behaviors and employee behaviors, has a certain inherent impact on mentality of miners, thus further affecting behaviors of miners at work. Conclusions made by Li Naiwen theoretically support the idea that grass-roots transformational leadership can effectively improve safety performance of charismatic leadership research. Moreover, the role of attitudes towards safety as a mediator between charismatic leadership and unsafe behaviors of charismatic leadership research is analyzed.
On this basis, the research model for this paper, that is, the model for impacts of charismatic leadership on unsafe behaviors of miners is developed to investigate impacts of charismatic leadership on unsafe behaviors of miners, charismatic leadership research. In this research model, charismatic charismatic leadership research is an charismatic leadership research variable while unsafe behaviors of miners serve as an explained variable.
Attitudes of miners towards safety produce mediating effects on impacts of charismatic leadership on unsafe behaviors of miners. The model built for this research is shown in Fig. Based on the theoretical analysis made above, following hypotheses are presented and examined. Charismatic leadership research 2: Visionary appeal has a negative impact on unsafe behaviors of miners. H 3: Charisma has a negative impact on unsafe behaviors of miners. H 4: Moral example has a negative impact on unsafe behaviors of miners.
Measurement of background variables: background variables include the gender, age, type of work, education background and working company and so on.
Measurement of Leadership styles: Cheung and other scholars study the SLB scale on the basis of the MLQ research made by Bass. In this paper, the scale which is modified by Zhang Zhijie [ 14 ] on the basis of charismatic leadership developed by Cheung is used as a reference. The four dimensions include 6, charismatic leadership research, 6, 4 and 4 items, respectively, charismatic leadership research. The Likert Scale is used for scoring points.
Measurement of attitudes towards safety: attitudes towards safety are measured through a scale which is adapted based on the self-made scale by Wu Jieliang [ 15 ] and Li Naiwen and Huang Peng [ 16 ].
Measurement indexes for attitudes towards safety mainly include awareness of the importance of safety operation and individual tendencies to see safety. Based on the two measurement indexes and relevant literature, charismatic leadership research, the first draft of questionnaire for investigating attitudes towards safety is developed, including 3 items. Measurement of unsafe behaviors: in this paper, on the basis of research achievements made by Wu Jianjin [ 17 ], Zheng Ying [ 18 ] and other scholars and field research made on coal mine enterprises, typical unsafe behaviors of miners are taken as indictors to measure unsafe behaviors of miners.
Three indicators are used for measuring unsafe behaviors, including safety inspection before work, rules and regulations breaking at work and safety production at work and covering three items.
Respondents are from 4 coal mines of the SD Company. A total of copies of questionnaires were sent out and copies were received. The response rate of questionnaires was The validness rate of questionnaires received was Among respondents completing valid respondents, of them are aged 35 or under; 20 of them are aged 36 to 40; 21 of them are aged 41 to 45; 22 of them are aged over In charismatic leadership research of education backgrounds, 44 of them were graduated from middle schools or primary schools or even received no education; 88 of them were graduated from high schools; 23 of them were graduated from institutions of higher education, 18 of them have bachelor degrees; 10 of them have master or PHD degrees.
In terms of in-service years, 76 of them have worked for no more than 5 years; 52 of them have worked for 6 to 10 years; 23 of them have worked for 11 to 20 years; 28 of them have worked for over 20 years. In terms of posts of duty, 46 of them are responsible for dig-in; 35 of them are responsible for coal mining; 42 of them are coal heavers; 39 of them are responsible for electromechanical guarantees; 17 of them are responsible for ventilations. In order to further explore impact of each dimension of charismatic leadership on unsafe behaviors of miners, charismatic leadership research, firstly, a theoretical model for impacts of charismatic leadership on unsafe behaviors of miners is built.
Secondly, Amos7. Lastly, the model is modified on the basis of model operation results. The hypothesis that i has no significant impact is eliminated and the final model is built, as shown in Fig. Final fitting model for relationships between charismatic leadership unsafe behaviors. Both NFI charismatic leadership research IFI are greater than 0. Although CFI fails to reach 0. It indicates that the absolute model fitting effects are raised to the normalized and required level.
According to data, the absolute value of the variable parameter C. R is greater than 2. Both 2. As normative standards for each error term are small in number, significance is tested to be up to standards. As it is proved by the structural equation model, charismatic leadership research, among 9 hypotheses presented above, 7 of them are supported while 2 of them are not supported, charismatic leadership research. According to test analytical results of the structural equation, it can be seen that standardized path coefficients between moral example and charisma as charismatic leadership research latent variables and unsafe behaviors as an endogenous variable are respectively The standardized path coefficient between attitudes towards safety and unsafe behaviors is Therefore, it can be concluded that each dimension of charismatic leadership has a negative impact on unsafe behaviors of miners.
As can be seen from the above analysis, attitudes towards safety serve as a mediator between charismatic leadership and unsafe behaviors of miners. The standardized path coefficient between moral example and attitudes towards safety is 0. In this way, unsafe behaviors of employees can be effectively reduced. The same is true with charisma as another dimension of charismatic leadership.
Charisma also has a negative impact on unsafe behaviors. The standardized path coefficient between unsafe behaviors and charisma is In the charismatic leadership research of safety management, many scholars at home and abroad have made research on the role of charismatic leadership in security management of enterprises.
However, no scholar has taken attitudes towards safety as a mediator to investigate deep-seated impacts of charismatic leadership on unsafe behaviors of miners. In this paper, the structural equation and relevant theories are used to charismatic leadership research a scientific discussion of impacts of charismatic leadership on unsafe behaviors of miners, charismatic leadership research, based on survey data about large-sized coal mine enterprises. Following conclusions are drawn.
They affect unsafe behaviors of miners, in varying degrees. The work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, The Doctoral Program FoundationThe authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.
National Center for Biotechnology Informationcharismatic leadership research, U. National Library of Medicine Rockville PikeBethesda MDUSA. NCBI Skip to main content Skip to navigation Resources How To About NCBI Accesskeys My NCBI Sign in to NCBI Sign Out.
PMC US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health. Search database PMC All Databases Assembly Biocollections BioProject BioSample BioSystems Books ClinVar Conserved Domains dbGaP dbVar Gene Genome GEO DataSets GEO Profiles GTR HomoloGene Identical Protein Groups MedGen MeSH NCBI Web Site NLM Catalog Nucleotide OMIM PMC PopSet Protein Protein Clusters Protein Family Models PubChem BioAssay PubChem Compound PubChem Substance PubMed SNP SRA Structure Taxonomy ToolKit ToolKitAll ToolKitBookgh Search term.
Journal List Open Biomed Eng J v. Open Biomed Eng J. Published online Sep doi: PMCID: PMC Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer. qq Received May 26; Revised Jul 14; Accepted Aug Copyright © Li et al.
The Dark Side of Charismatic Leaders
, time: 3:07
Charismatic leadership: an exploratory investigation, page 3 gestures, inflections and speaking styles used to gain a desired effect on the audience. Additional probing explored the use of humor, the importance or emphasis on personal appearance, or any other variable used by the research subjects to invoke emotion from their given audience. TheseCited by: 5 AbstractCharismatic leadership is the procedure of encourage certain behaviors in other via power of personality, persuasion and communication this study shows the result between charismatic leadership and organizational effectiveness. It highlighting theFile Size: KB The research specifically focused on how immediacy and dominance impacted the relationship between leaders’ delivery styles and followers’ mood, perceptions of charismatic leadership, and Estimated Reading Time: 4 mins
No comments:
Post a Comment